Solutions / Intelligent model routing

Better model choices.
Built into your stack.

Match the work to an eligible model. Account for tools, context, cache state, and quality before making a switch.

Caveman Router + Cloud · routing in development

See the whole picture

The model you trust becomes the model you use for everything.

Model lock-in
has a running cost.

Match the request.

Consider the work, the tools it requires, and the models in your allowed pool.

Price the transition.

A lower token price can lose to cache rebuilding. Evaluate the switch in the context of the session.

Keep your quality bar.

Only compare qualified candidates. When a switch is unsupported, retaining the baseline is a valid result.

The cheapest model
may be the wrong answer.

Price is part of the decision. Change the tool and cache requirements in this example to see why a candidate qualifies—or gets held back.

Route decision labIllustrative policy
Change the request

Cheap is only
the first question.

Turn the constraints on and off. Watch which route remains eligible.

S
Small modelTool capability missing
—
M
Current modelCompatible · session continuity
L
Frontier modelCompatible · higher cost
—

Small model excluded: required tool capability is missing.

Illustrative routing policy. Real decisions depend on configured capabilities, quality evidence, prices, context limits, and session economics.

{ query: string, limit: number }Arguments validated

Tool-aware admission.

A candidate must support the required tool and output formats before it gets ranked.

Context carried forward
Reuse eligible cached context

Session-aware economics.

Preserve valuable cached context when a switch does not justify rebuilding it.

Quality
Cost
PolicyPending

Evidence before promotion.

Keep quality and policy checks between a candidate route and production traffic.

Prove the route.
Then give it traffic.

Inspect each stage. Every promotion has a purpose, and production keeps a baseline to return to.

Capture representative traffic before proposing a change.

Stage preview

Route intelligently.
See what changed.

Router makes the choice. Platform keeps the cost, usage, and routing record in view. A route report should explain the change—including a decision to leave traffic where it was.

Provider / model / effort

Treat the complete model action as the route identity.

Baseline / candidate / outcome

Keep the comparison explicit, with an explanation for rejected alternatives.

Inferred / verified

Keep modeled opportunity separate from provider-causal savings.

Make every token count.

Make the model
choice count.

Go deeper into cache-aware routing, capability gates, and the economics of a completed task.